Legal Opinion

Warford v. Medeiros

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 15, 1984No. A015612PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

This case raises questions concerning the conditions under, which discovery may be compelled from unwilling nonparty witnesses who invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.

On June 3, 1981, plaintiffs J. Albert Warford and Joanne Stevens filed an application for an order to show cause why Manuel Wayne Medeiros, Bernice Sanga Medeiros and John Edward Medeiros (hereinafter nonparty deponents) should not be required to provide deposition testimony and certain documents. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 2034.) Plaintiffs’ application was supported by an affidavit…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,322 Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Financial Group of Texas, Inc., William H. HowtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dana Point Safe Harbor Collective v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. TrujequeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Oiye v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Klein v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Nakamura v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API