Legal Opinion

Rose v. Hayden

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 47 opinions

Error from Jaclcson District Court. Ejectment, brought by Hayden agaiust Rose. Trial by the court, at the July Term, 1884, aud judgment for plaintiff. The defendant brings the case to this court. • The opinion states the material facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action in the nature of ejectment, brought by Charles Hayden against E. D. Rose for the' recovery of lots numbered 100 and 102, on Wisconsin avenue, in the city of Holton. The case was tried before the court, without a jury, and the court made a general finding in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, and rendered judgment accordingly; and to reverse this judgment the defendant brings the case to this court.

In the court below the plaintiff claimed to hold the absolute title, legal and equitable, to lot No. 100, and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Wood v. . RabeNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Rothwell v. DeweesSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  4. Steere v. SteereNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
  5. Sandfoss v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. Carl v. SettegastTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Decatur Cooperative Association v. UrbanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API