Carr v. Leavitt
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to the Superior Court of Detroit. (Chipman, J.)— Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.
Action of assumpsit. The plaintiff testified on his own behalf in substance as follows:
That defendant, in October, 1881, was desirous of purchasing from one Kearsley certain lots in the city of Detroit-,, and of procuring the services of the plaintiff in bringing-about such purchase, and accordingly entered into the following contract with the plaintiff:
That the said plaintiff should employ his time and services in and about the purchase of the said property of said Kearsley at a price fixed between plaintiff and defendant, and in and about the management of the said Kearsley property, in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bunnel v. Taintor's administratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
- Hess v. FoxNew York Supreme Court · 1833
- Bruce v. HastingsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1868
- Hillebrands v. NibbelinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Heyn v. PhilipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Petrie v. TorrentMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Logan v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Miskiewicz v. SmolenskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Raub v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Roulo v. Automobile Club of Mich.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.