Legal Opinion
Malhotra v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 7, 2005No. 2:00-cv-06386PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The plaintiffs Sham Malhotra (“Malho-tra”) and Mervin Fischman (“Fischman”), on behalf of themselves and a putative class of investors, commenced this action against the defendants The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, AXA Advisors, LLC and Equitable Distributors, Inc. (collectively, “Equitable” or the “Defendants”) alleging violations of section 10(b) (“Section 10(b)”) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5 (“Rule 10b-5”)…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Metlife Demutualization LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Poptech, L.P. v. Stewardship Investment Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Cooper v. Pacific Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2006