In Re Metlife Demutualization Litigation
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PLATT, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant MetLife’s motion for summary judgment or in the alternative partial summary judgment. Also before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons described below, MetLife’s motion for summary judgment and Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment are DENIED.
The undersigned assumes familiarity with this Court’s earlier decision denying MetLife’s initial motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ original complaint in this case filed under Section 12(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 in In Re: MetLife Demutualization…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Metlife Demutualization LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Fiala v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 2010
- In re MetLife Demutualization LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- In re MetLife Demutualization LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Rensel v. Centra Tech, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2019