Legal Opinion

Purdy v. County of Madison

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1952No. 33204PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

The plaintiff seeks an injunction against the County of Madison to restrain the defendant from diverting surface waters from a natural drainage course into the north ditch of a county road where it is carried to the east to the damage of' the plaintiff. The trial court found against the plaintiff and dismissed the action. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff is- the owner of the southeast quarter of Section 2, Township 22 North, Range 1, West of the 6th P. M., Madison County, Nebraska. The southwest quarter of the section is owned by Carl Goetsch. A county road runs along the south side of these two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roe v. Howard CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Leaders v. Sarpy CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Jack v. TeegardenNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Pospisil v. JessenNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Andersen v. Town of MapleNebraska Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ricenbaw v. KrausNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Gable v. the Pathfinder Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Mader v. MettenbrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Armbruster v. Stanton-Pilger Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Town of Everett, Burt County v. TeigelerNebraska Supreme Court · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API