Legal Opinion

Armbruster v. Stanton-Pilger Drainage District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1957No. 34251PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYeager, J.

This action as originally instituted was. for mandatory injunction by Bert Armbruster and Irene Arm bruster, husband and wife, and joint owners of a half section of land in Stanton County, Nebraska, plaintiffs and appellants herein, against Stanton-Pilger Drainage District, defendant and appellee. Later an amended and supplemental petition was filed. By this petition the plaintiffs renewed their application for mandatory injunction and in addition sought a judgment for damages. Issues were joined and a trial was had to the court. At the conclusion of the evidence of plaintiffs, on motion of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roe v. Howard CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Adams v. AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Brchan v. Crete MillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Quest v. East Omaha Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Livingston v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Prendergast v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wischmann v. RaikesNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Whitehead Oil Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Wyoming State Highway Department v. NapolitanoWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Armbruster v. Stanton-Pilger Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API