Legal Opinion

Mader v. Mettenbrink

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1954No. 33513PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWenke, J.

George P. Mader and Geraldine P. Mader brought this action in the district court for Hall County against Henry-W. Mettenbrink and Beulah Mettenbrink. The purpose of the action is to obtain a mandatory injunction compelling the defendants to make an opening in, or place a culvert through, their irrigation dike; to restore an alleged watercourse across their land to its former condition; and for such other and different relief as the court may deem equitable. Trial was had and the court found generally for the plaintiffs. It decreed:

“* * * that the defendants Henry W. Mettenbrink and Beulah…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Ricenbaw v. KrausNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Independent Stock Farm v. StevensNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Morrissey v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Roe v. Howard CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Nichol v. YocumNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Town of Everett, Burt County v. TeigelerNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Hillary Corp. v. United States Cold Storage, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Mueller v. BohannonNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API