Legal Opinion

Jack v. Teegarden

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1949No. 32538PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWenke, J.

William D. Jack brought this action in the district court for Nemaha County against J. H.. Teegarden.' The purpose of the action is to require defendant to remove obstructions from and restore a watercourse on his lands to a sufficient capacity to carry the water that naturally flows therein, to lower or remove a dike constructed thereon, just west of the ditch so that it is no higher than the level of his land, arid to permanently enjoin the defendant from again either blocking the watercourse or building a dike. In' addition- to this injunctive relief plaintiff asked for damagés in the sum;…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Mauvaisterre Drainage & Levee District v. Wabash Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Morrissey v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Roe v. Howard CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Town v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Robbins v. BeattySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  2. Mader v. MettenbrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Keim v. DowningNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Lackaff v. BogueNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Schomberg v. KutherNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API