Poirier & McLane Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
In this action plaintiff seeks to recover $19,901.08, representing increased labor costs incurred by plaintiff, a New York corporation, in the performance of a contract with the defendant for the construction of a flight hangar in Buffalo, New York. The increased labor costs resulted from the payment by plaintiff of a higher wage rate to unskilled laborers working on the project than that contained in the contract specifications, as fixed and determined by the Secretary of Labor under the Davis-Bacon Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 276a et seq.
The case is presently before the court on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Binghamton Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Walsh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
- Sutcliffe Storage & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Sutcliffe Storage & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Albert & Harrison, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McNamara Construction of Manitoba, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Southwest Welding & Manufacturing Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Evans Reamer & MacHine Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Morrison-Hardeman-Perini-Leavell v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Ross Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.