Legal Opinion

Poirier & McLane Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 6, 1954No. 49623PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

In this action plaintiff seeks to recover $19,901.08, representing increased labor costs incurred by plaintiff, a New York corporation, in the performance of a contract with the defendant for the construction of a flight hangar in Buffalo, New York. The increased labor costs resulted from the payment by plaintiff of a higher wage rate to unskilled laborers working on the project than that contained in the contract specifications, as fixed and determined by the Secretary of Labor under the Davis-Bacon Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 276a et seq.

The case is presently before the court on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Binghamton Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Walsh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  3. Sutcliffe Storage & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  4. Sutcliffe Storage & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  5. Albert & Harrison, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McNamara Construction of Manitoba, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  2. Southwest Welding & Manufacturing Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Evans Reamer & MacHine Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. Morrison-Hardeman-Perini-Leavell v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  5. Ross Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API