Legal Opinion

Ross Engineering Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 11, 1955No. 48680PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littleton, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

Plaintiff sues to recover $63,185.97 representing extra labor costs incurred in the performance of a lump-sum construction contract entered into with defendant through the Federal Public Housing Authority on June 23, 1944, for the construction of war housing facilities in Baltimore, Maryland. The increased costs resulted from payment by plaintiff to several crafts working on the project of higher wage rates than the rates contained in the contract specifications.

The Invitation for Bids called the bidder’s attention to the fact that the wage…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Poirier & McLane Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  2. A. J. Paretta Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cook v. Oklahoma Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Fowler v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Black, Raber-Kief & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. Morrison-Hardeman-Perini-Leavell v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  5. Black, Raber-Kief & Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API