Legal Opinion
Morrison-Hardeman-Perini-Leavell v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 19, 1968No. 378-65PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Saul Richard Gamer with direction to make his recommendation for conclusions of law on plaintiff’s motion and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment under Rule 54(b). The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on January 29, 1968 wherein such facts as are necessary to the opinion are stated. Plaintiff has filed no request for review of the commissioner’s opinion, report and recom mended conclusion of law and the time for so filing pursuant to the rules of the court has expired. On March 5, 1968 defendant filed a…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Binghamton Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- F. H. McGraw & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- Sunswick Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
- Bateson-Stolte, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Nello L. Teer Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Southern Electrical Services, Inc. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Hales Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Audit Division of the State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Heagy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Metrig Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Southern Electrical Services, Inc. as Assignee of the Morganti Group, Inc. and the Morganti Group Inc. v. the City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.