Legal Opinion

Albert & Harrison, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 2, 1946No. 46125PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiff, a partnership, sues to recover the cost of alleged extra work, additional pay to bricklayers, and liquidated damages withheld by the Government, in connection with its contract with the United States for the renovation of three buildings at the Raritan Arsenal, Metu-chen, New Jersey.. The claim for extra work is based upon an allegedly misleading drawing which the Government sent the plaintiff as a part of its invitation for bids on the project. There were three buildings to be renovated, numbered N-5, M-4, and L-3, each about 600 feet long and 115 feet wide. Each…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Massman Const. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  2. Massman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Binghamton Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Ambrose-Augusterfer Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Poirier & McLane Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  4. Walsh Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  5. Irwin & Leighton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API