Legal Opinion
McNamara Construction of Manitoba, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 22, 1975No. 417-73PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBennett, Judge
By fixed-price contract dated June 30, 1964, plaintiff McNamara Construction of Manitoba, Ltd. (hereinafter McNamara) undertook to construct for the Army Corps of Engineers a canal lock and related structures (New Second Lock) at St. Mary’s Falls Canal, Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan.1 The original completion date of June 30,1967, was extended by a series of modifications to October 19,1968. The work was completed and accepted as of that latter date and the administrative claims under the contract have been settled.
*4This claim arises out of unusually severe labor problems— strikes, delays, and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Day v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- National Presto Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Natus Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- ITT Arctic Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Pauley Petroleum Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Cronin v. LindbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Essex Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.