Legal Opinion

Gruhlke v. Sioux Empire Federal Credit Union, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 2008No. 24579PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] As part of her wrongful termination and breach of contract suit against her company, plaintiff also sued a company officer. She asserted that the company officer, to advance his own interests, tor-tiously interfered with her contractual relationship by advocating for the nonrenewal of her employment contract. Ruling that no such cause of action could be brought against a company officer, the circuit court granted the officer’s motion to dismiss. We conclude that in the employment context, under limited circumstances, an action for intentional interference with…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Holloway v. SkinnerTexas Supreme Court · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Dykstra v. Page Holding Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Qwest Communications Corp. v. Free Conferencing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  3. Tolle v. LevSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Nooney v. StubHub, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Total Auctions & Real Estate, LLC v. South Dakota Department of Revenue & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API