Nooney v. StubHub, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] John and Kimberly Nooney sued StubHub Inc. after tickets they purchased from StubHub for a concert were not honored at the event. In granting StubHub’s motion to dismiss' .for failure to state a claim, 1 the circuit court considered a document that was not attached to the complaint. ' On appeal, Nooneys argue that the court- erred in considering the document Without • converting the motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment. Noo-neys also argue that the court erred in dismissing the complaint on the merits. We affirm the court’s consideration of the document…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sander v. Geib, Elston, Frost Professional Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Gruhlke v. Sioux Empire Federal Credit Union, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Sisney v. Best Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Gul v. Center for Family MedicineSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Abdulrazzak v. S.D. Bd. of Pardons and ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Healy Ranch v. MinesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Total Auctions & Real Estate, LLC v. South Dakota Department of Revenue & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Paul v. BathurstSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- MacH v. ConnorsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.