Legal Opinion
Duprey v. Connecticut, Department of Motor Vehicles
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 17, 1998No. 3:96-cv-01679PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, defendant the State of Connecticut Department of Motor Vehicles (“DMV”) moves for summary judgment. Plaintiff Michelle Duprey, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, cross-moves for summary judgment. For the following reasons, we DENY defendant’s motion (Doc. # 10) and GRANT plaintiffs motion (Doc. #12).
BACKGROUND
The following facts are not in dispute, and both parties agree this case should be resolved by summary judgment because the complaint raises only legal issues.
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Thrope v. State of OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
- Ubel v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- People v. FulvioCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1987
- McGarry v. DIRECTOR, DEPT. OF REVENUE, STATE OF MO.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1998
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marcus v. Kansas, Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- William Robert Dare Gary Petillo v. State of California Dept. Of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Anderson v. Macy's, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Duprey v. Connecticut Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Expressions Hair Design v. SchneidermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.