Legal Opinion
William Robert Dare Gary Petillo v. State of California Dept. Of Motor Vehicles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 16, 1999No. 97-56065PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge D.W. NELSON; Dissent by Judge FERNANDEZ.
D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
This case involves a challenge under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq. (West Supp.1999) (“ADA”), and its regulations to California’s $6 biennial fee for disability parking placards. The State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles [hereinafter “California”], appeals the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of William Robert Dare, Gray Petillo, and the class of plaintiffs they represent. California claims that the fee does not violate the ADA…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Lovell v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Byrum v. LandrethCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Miranda B. v. KitzhaberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dossey Douglas v. California Department of Youth AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.