Legal Opinion
Thrope v. State of Ohio
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 28, 1998No. C-1-96-764PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. #35), and the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. #34). This case came before the Court for oral argument on July 1, 1998. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ Motion is hereby GRANTED and Defendants’ Motion is hereby DENIED.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a class action lawsuit brought pursuant to the Americans…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Marcus v. Kansas, Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- William Robert Dare Gary Petillo v. State of California Dept. Of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Hedgepeth v. TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Hexom v. Oregon Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Schall v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.