Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Macy's, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 2, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-556PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARK R. HORNAK, District Judge.
Christina Anderson (“Anderson”) filed this suit under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”), alleging that she is a disabled person under that statute and that Defendants’ retail stores are public accommodations under the ADA which fail to comply with ADA standards by what she considered to be negatively disparate product placement and pricing of “plus-sized” women’s clothing.1
Before the Court is a Motion filed by Defendants Macy’s Incorporated, Macy’s East, and Macy’s Central (collectively “Macy’s”), to…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Giterman v. Pocono Med. Ctr.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Jefferson v. Stinson Morrison Heckler LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Tatum v. Board of Supervisors for the University of Louisiana SystemDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
- Dial, Inc., a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation v. City OfNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
- A.H. v. MEDICAL RESCUE TEAM SOUTH AUTHORITYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.