Legal Opinion
Ubel v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 9, 1996No. C7-94-300PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COYNE, Justice.
In this class action physicians whose licenses to practice medicine were initially issued or were renewed between April 1, 1992 and September 30, 1992, challenge the assessment of a $400 license surcharge payable on or before December 15, 1992 pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 147.01, subd. 6 (1992). The district court ruled that the statute was ambiguous and that on the basis of legislative history and a 1993 “clarifying” amendment the assessment was a proper application of the statute. On appeal from summary judgment in favor of the defendants — the State of Minnesota,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Nichols v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Blodgett v. HoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. CarltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Braylock v. JessonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Greenwich Hospital v. GavinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company Marvin Windows of Tennessee, Inc. v. Ppg Industries, Inc., Third Party v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc., Third Party Minnesota, Amicus on Behalf OfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Duprey v. Connecticut, Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.