Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Johnson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 29, 1921No. A-4076PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBessey, J.

William Johnson, the petitioner, was ©n the 4th day of September, 1921 (Sunday), arrested for violating certain ordinances of the city of Bartlesville, by operating and ¡maintaining a moving picture show in said city on Sunday. On the 6th day of September, 1921, the petitioner was tried on this charge and found guilty, and his punishment was fixed at a fine ,of $50 and costs, amounting to $6.75, in default of the payment of which the petitioner was committed to and incarcerated in the city jail until such fine and costs should be paid.

At the trial the petitioner pleaded not guilty and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. In Re SimmonsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Ex Parte BochmannCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Ex Parte MonroeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Ex Parte HoustonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Ex Parte BochmannCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API