Legal Opinion
Contested Case of Ebenezer Society v. Minnesota Department of Human Services
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 20, 1988No. C1-88-1384PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
The relators Aicota Nursing Home, Inc., Augustana Nursing Home, Inc., Lakeside Nursing Home, St. Otto’s Home and St. Francis Home are medical assistance providers entitled to reimbursement for the care of needy persons under the Title XIX Medical Assistance Program in the State of Minnesota. 42 U.S.C.A. § 1396a(a)(5) (West Supp.1988); 42 C.F.R. § 431.10 (1987); Minn.Stat. § 256B.41-.502 (1986). For the rate-setting period in question, November 1, 1985 to June 30, 1986, the nursing homes’ rates were governed by Minn.R. 9549.0010-.0080, commonly referred to by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Resident v. NootSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- White Bear Lake Care Center, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Mapleton Community Home, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adams v. Colorado Department of Social ServicesColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Dullard v. Minnesota Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- In re Pera Salary Determinations Affecting Retired & Active EmployeesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Lawful Gambling License of Eagles Aerie 2341, Detroit Lakes, MN License No. 00548 v. State Lawful Gambling Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995