Legal Opinion
Resident v. Noot
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 1, 1981No. 51342PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Justice.
Defendant, Arthur E. Noot, Commissioner of the Department of Public Welfare (D.P.W.), appeals from a judgment of the Hennepin County District Court declaring invalid a D.P.W. Medical Assistance Policy. We affirm.
The facts in this case are not in dispute. Plaintiff 1 is a ninety-six year old resident of a nursing home; she is currently assigned to a double room. Plaintiff is “medically needy” and therefore eligible to receive Medical Assistance (M.A.). Although plaintiff cannot live alone, she does not need the skilled nursing care that would require her to be assigned to a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- White v. BealCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Norman v. St. ClairCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- In Re Estate of AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Olszewski v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Brayton v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated WastewaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.