Adams v. Colorado Department of Social Services
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DUBOFSKY.
This class action is brought on behalf of individuals who were excluded, by virtue of a new regulation adopted by defendant Colorado Department of Social Services (Department), from receiving State Home Care Allowance (HCA) benefits. One hundred seventy-two individuals were certified by the trial court as constituting a class that was adversely affected by the implementation of this new regulation. Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s summary judgment entered in favor of defendants. We reverse.
The Colorado Department of Social Services administers public assistance…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Amisub (Psl), Inc. v. State of Colorado Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Henning v. Industrial Welfare CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- R & F Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Alabama Nursing Home Ass'n v. CalifanoDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Colorado Department of Revenue v. Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Sears v. RomerColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Colorado Citizens for Ethics in Government v. Committee for American DreamColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Jordan v. Maxim Healthcare ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Eason v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF BOULDERColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.