Legal Opinion
In re Pera Salary Determinations Affecting Retired & Active Employees
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 6, 2012No. A11-1330PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHNSON, Chief Judge.
In March 2009, the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) notified 485 active and retired employees of the City of Duluth that PERA intended to make adjustments to their defined-benefit retirement plans. PERA decided that adjustments were necessary because it determined that the city had, for more than a decade, miscalculated the amounts of contributions to its employees’ retirement plans. PERA’s adjustments would result in smaller retirement annuity payments for retired city employees.
Some of the persons who received PERA’s notices challenged the decision,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Minnesota Transitions Charter School v. Commissioner of Minnesota Department of EducationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Hubbard County, Relator v. James Card, Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota, ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026
- In re Minn. Living Assistance, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- United States Steel Corporation, Relator v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015