Legal Opinion

Moorman v. Quick

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1863PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Franklin Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

Quick sued Moorman and one Hyman, averring that he was school director, and as such had employed said Hyman to teach; that he had advanced money, &c., to said Hyman, during the progress of his school, to enable him to support his family, under an agreement that he was to draw the money that was due said Hyman, for said services, at the end of his term; that upon the written order of said teacher upon the township trustee, he, said Quick, received from said trustee a check upon the bank for the sum due for said services, 81 dollars and 25 cents; a small part of which was due said plaintiff,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. De Ruiter v. De RuiterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Ferguson v. DayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Dederick v. BrandtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Ecker v. LindskogSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Marden v. StarrU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API