Legal Opinion

De Ruiter v. De Ruiter

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1901No. 3,800PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From Marion Superior Court; J. M. Leathers, Judge. Action by Laura E. De Ruiter against Derk De Ruiter for divorce and alimony and to set aside a conveyance of real estate. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

Appellee was plaintiff below, and prosecuted her action against the appellant Derk De Ruiter for divorce, and to recover alimony. Appellants Vanderwerf and Vanderwerf are husband and wife, and were made parties for the reason that it was. charged in the amended complaint that appellant De Ruiter had conveyed to> appellant Eva G. Vanderwerf, who was his daughter, all of his real estate, and that the purpose of said conveyance was to defraud appellee, etc. It was therefore sought, not only to procure a decree of divorce and secure alimony in favor of appellee, but also to set aside such…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Feigley v. FeigleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  3. Harding v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Musselman v. MusselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Frakes v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1830

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wireman v. WiremanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Crowder v. CrowderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  3. BLOUNT v. BlountMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Copper Process Co. v. Chicago Bonding & Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920
  5. Lovegrove v. LovegroveSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API