Legal Opinion
Marden v. Starr
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana
Decided March 29, 1901No. 9,956PublishedCited by 2 opinions
At Law.
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, District Judge.
The amended complaint is in replevin. It alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff is a citizen and resident of the state of Wisconsin, and that the defendant is a citizen and resident of the state of Indiana, and that 'the plaintiff is the owner and lawfully entitled to the immediate possession of the following described personal property:' (Here follows a'description of numerous articles of personal property, alleged to be of the value of $4,000.) The complaint then proceeds:
“And which is the same property which the defendant, as sheriff of Delaware county, in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- James L. v. CarrylSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Wiswall v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crowe v. Peaslee-Gaulbert Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
- Crowe v. Peaslee-Gaulbert Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930