Legal Opinion

Ecker v. Lindskog

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Brookings county. Hon. Julian Bennett, Judge. Action in claim and delivery by Maria Ecker against G. A. Lindskog. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtFuller, P. J.

This action in claim and delivery, to recover from the sheriff certain personal property upon which lie had levied executions, and of which plaintiff, in her complaint, claims to be owner, resulted in her favor, and the defendant appeals. The value of the property seized, consisting mainly of farm horses, with their harnesses, and a wagon, together with all personal property enumerated in her schedule of ex*429emptions, does not exceed the amount allowed by law to the head of the family; and the ownership of such property, and her right to claim the same as exempt, are the only points that need…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Paddock v. BalgordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Noyes v. BeldingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Sprague v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1868
  4. Crane v. Waggoner & WifeIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Holdridge v. LeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ness v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Shriver-Johnson Co. v. HargravesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. In Re DavisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API