Legal Opinion

Dederick v. Brandt

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1896No. 1,765PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Jasper Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

Appellee sued appellant Sollars, seeking to recover possession of a haypress. Sollars justified his possession as holding for and under the sheriff of Lake county, who had taken the press from appellee by virtue of a writ of replevin. Dederick was made a party defendant upon his own motion and answered *265also that he owned the property and was entitled to hold it. The questions presented are raised by the motion for new trial.

While the evidence is conflicting, there is abundant to justify the court in holding that the press was taken from appellee’s farm in his absence and against his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cockrum v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Cutshaw v. FargoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Moorman v. QuickIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re BreckenridgeNevada Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Pinkus v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Thompson v. NeillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API