Legal Opinion

Frost Gear & Forge Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 2, 1931No. H-454PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHALEY, Judge.

The plaintiff is a manufacturer of several kinds of gears; i. e., pinion, ring, differential, and transmission. It is the successor to a partnership which had been making these gears for printing presses, pumping machines, wire-bending machines, and many other classes of machinery for many years prior to the advent of the automobile, auto truck, or motorcycle.

This suit is brought to recover taxes paid under sections 900, subdivision (3) of the Revenue Acts of 1918 and 1921 (40 Stat. 1122, 42 Stat. 291), and section 600, subdivision (3) of the Revenue Act of 1924 (43 Stat. 253,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Universal Battery Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Atwater Kent Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  4. W. M. Dutton & Sons Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  5. Weeks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Durkee-Atwood Co. v. WillcutsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  2. Dalton & Balch, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  3. United States Gear Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API