Legal Opinion

Dalton & Balch, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 5, 1934No. K-372Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Judge.

This is an automobile “parts or accessories” case. The rule as to what constitutes a part or accessory for an automobile is announced by the Supreme Court in Universal Battery Co. v. United States, 281 U. S. 580, 50 S. Ct. 422, 74 L. Ed. 1051, and has been uniformly followed by this and other courts in numerous cases, unnecessary to cite here. *730The test is the primary adaptability of the article sought to be taxed for use in motor vehicles. If it is primarily adapted for such use, it-is to be regarded as a part or accessory for an automobile even though there are other uses of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Universal Battery Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Frost Gear & Forge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  4. Perfection Gear Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API