Legal Opinion

W. M. Dutton & Sons Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 6, 1931No. H-397PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Judge.

Plaintiff sues for recovery of excise taxes' assessed on sales of air pumps during the period from March 1, 1919, to February 28, 1926, under section 900 of the Revenue Act of February 24, 1919, 40 Stat. 1122 (and similar provisions of the acts of 1921 and 1924).

Section 900 (3) of the Internal Revenue Acts of 1918 (40 Stat. 1122) and 1921 (42 Stat. 291), and section 600 (3) of the act of 1924 (26 USCA § 881 note), provide for excise taxes on “tires, inner tubes, parts, or accessories” of automobiles or motor cycles “sold to any person other than a manufacturer or producer” of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Universal Battery Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Atwater Kent Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  4. Cole Storage Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  5. Walker Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frost Gear & Forge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  2. Anthony Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API