Legal Opinion

United States Gear Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 1, 1936No. H-455Published

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Chief Justice.

This tax case involves an issue of fact. The suit is brought under the. provisions of subdivision 3 of section 900 of the Revenue Acts of 1918 and 1921, and subdivision 3 of section 600 of the Revenue Act of 1924 (43 Stat. 322). The acts of 1918 and 1921 (40 Stat. 1122; 42 Stat. 291) are in part as follows:

“Sec. 900. That * * * there shall be levied, assessed, collected, and paid upon the following articles sold or leased by the manufacturer, producer, or importer, a tax equivalent to the following percentages of the price for which so sold or leased-—
“(1) Automobile…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Universal Battery Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Frost Gear & Forge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API