Legal Opinion

Atwater Kent Manufacturing Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 14, 1926No. D-1026PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, Ohief Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court:

Recovery is sought of certain taxes which plaintiff was required to pay under section 900 (3) of the "revenue acts of 1918 and 1921 on the sale of “timers and coils” manufactured by it. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue refused to refund the amount collected. The case was referred to a commissioner of this court for a finding and report to the court of the facts. Both parties have requested that the court adopt the findings of the commissioner as the facts of the case, and the court has done this. They also agree that only one…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cole Storage Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  2. Milwaukee Motor Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  3. Edison Storage Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  4. National Rubber Filler Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
  5. Borg & Beck Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API