Legal Opinion
Trent Tube Division, Crucible Materials Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 20, 1990No. 87-12-01189PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CARMAN, Judge:
Plaintiffs seek review of the final determination of the United States International Trade Commission (hereinafter Commission or ITC) that an industry in the United States is not materially injured by reason of imports of welded stainless steel pipe and tubes from Sweden. See Stainless Steel Pipes and Tubes from Sweden, USITC Pub. No. 2033, (Final) (Nov.1987) (hereinafter ITC Pub.2033). Notice of the ITC’s final determination was published in 52 Fed.Reg. 45,256 (Nov. 25, 1987). Plaintiffs contend that three of the five Commissioners reached this negative…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- American Spring Wire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Maine Potato Council v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Copperweld Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Trent Tube Division v. Avesta Sandvik Tube AbCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- BIC Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Taiwan Semiconductor Industry Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Calabrian Corp. v. United States International Trade CommissionUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Coalition for the Preservation of American Brake Drum & Rotor Aftermarket Manufacturers v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.