Legal Opinion

Opper v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 6, 1954No. 49PublishedCited by 1,203 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed

Petitioner seeks review of a conviction under charges that he violated 18 U. S. C. § 281, a section which punishes employees of the United States who receive outside compensation for any services to be rendered in any matter before a federal department or agency in which the United States is a party. Petitioner was not himself an employee but was charged with inducing a federal employee to accept compensation for such services through conspiring with him for that purpose. Such inducement violates 18 U. S. C. §§ 2 and 281. The sections are set out in the margin. 1

Count 1 of the indictment…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Warszower v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Forte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,203 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Delli Paoli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

1,198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API