Legal Opinion

State v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 24, 1992No. CC90-1096; CA A65911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for burglary in the first degree and theft in the first degree. He assigns as error the trial court’s order of restitution. He argues that the trial court did not consider his financial resources and ability to pay as required by ORS 137.106. We agree and remand for resentencing.

After a jury convicted defendant, the trial court sentenced him to 18 months in prison with 36 months of post-prison supervision. The trial court also ordered defendant to pay $5,000 in restitution to the victim. The state acknowledges that the trial court did not consider defendant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API