State v. Gruver

Defendant appeals her conviction for theft in the first degree, ORS 164.055, challenging the trial court’s award of restitution. Defendant argues that the trial court erred hy imposing restitution in the absence of sufficient evidence of the value of the merchandise that she stole or the necessary repair costs for the property that she damaged. Defendant concedes that her assignment of error is unpreserved, but she urges us to conclude that the error is plain and exercise our discretion to correct it. Because the trial court did not plainly err, we affirm.

The pertinent facts are undisputed.…