Legal Opinion

Towers v. Rosenblum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 2013No. S061292PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Petitioners seek review of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 9 (2014), arguing that the ballot title does not satisfy the requirements of ORS 250.035(2). We review a certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with those statutory requirements. See ORS 250.085(5) (stating standard of review). For the reasons that follow, we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification.

Initiative Petition 9, if adopted by the voters, would amend several provisions of the Oregon Public Employee Collective Bargaining Act (PECBA).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greene v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Whitsett v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Dale v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Novick v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Sizemore v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Conroy v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Conroy v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Green v. Rosenblum (Ballot Title)Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Paden / von Schlegell v. Rayfield (S072772)Oregon Supreme Court · 2026
  5. Sasinowski v. Legislative AssemblyOregon Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API