Legal Opinion

Conroy v. Rosenblum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2016No. S063735Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 17 March 24, 2016 807 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Heather CONROY; Margaret (“Maggie”) Neel, an individual elector; Mike Forest, an individual elector; Hanna Vaandering; Trent Lutz; and Richard Schwarz, Petitioners, v. Ellen ROSENBLUM, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent. (SC S063735) En Banc On petition to review ballot title filed December 15, 2015; considered and under advisement February 9, 2016. Steven C. Berman, Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter, P.C., Portland, filed the petition and reply for petitioner Heather Conroy. Nathan R. Rietmann, Salem, filed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Kain/Waller v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Greene v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Whitsett v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API