Legal Opinion

Paden / von Schlegell v. Rayfield (S072772)

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2026No. S072772Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 23 May 7, 2026 249 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Kelsey PADEN and Christy Mason, Petitioners, v. Dan RAYFIELD, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent. John VON SCHLEGELL, Petitioner, v. Dan RAYFIELD, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent. (SC S072772 (Control); S072776) On petitions to review ballot title filed on March 13, 2026; considered and under advisement on April 16, 2026. Adam S. Arms, Bennett Hartman, LLP, Portland, filed the petition and reply for petitioners Kelsey Paden and Christy Mason. Also on the reply was Margaret S. Olney. Aaron Landau,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Novick/Crew v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Caruthers v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Towers v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Hurst/Van Dusen v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API