Legal Opinion
KLAJIC v. Castaic Lake Water Agency
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 20, 2001No. B137258PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
Introduction
Petitioners, 1 water users in the Santa Clarita Valley area, appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their petition for writ of mandate. Petitioners sought to compel respondent Castaic Lake Water Agency (the Agency) to divest itself of its ownership of all of the stock of respondent Santa Clarita Water Company (the Water Company), and to comply with its own enabling statute, which limits the Agency to the wholesale distribution of water.
At issue in this appeal is the interpretation and application of Water Code 2 section 12944.7. That section allows a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Lewin v. St. Joseph Hospital of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Clark v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Mid-Century Insurance v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Grinzi v. San Diego Hospice Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Castaic Lake Water Agency v. Whittaker Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of TurlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. Pacific LandmarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Bernard v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.