Legal Opinion
Scovill Local 1604 v. Scovill Manufacturing Co.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided November 8, 1951No. File 19559PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
The plaintiff is a labor union which is the collec' tive bargaining agent in the defendant’s plant.
The parties entered into a fifty'sevempage labor agreement “Exhibit A’’ effective as of October 5, 1950. Article X, on page 16, provides that (paragraph 1) : “a grievance involving inter' pretation of or application of provisions of this Agreement . . . may be taken to arbitration by either [party}”; (paragraph 2) “arbitration will be for the sole purpose of interpreting or applying the specific provision or provisions of this Agreement involved in the grievance”; (paragraph 11) “the arbitrator…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Western Union Telegraph Co. & American Communications Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Ives v. City of WillimanticSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Anselmo v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Liggett v. Torrington Building Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Perkins v. Eagle Lock Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Royal McBee Corp. v. Royal Industrial Union Local 937Connecticut Superior Court · 1955