Royal McBee Corp. v. Royal Industrial Union Local 937
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
The present applications arise out of the following circumstances: S was an employee of the plaintiff corporation and for a considerable period of time was justifiably absent from work because of a leg condition. When his health permitted his return to work on June 28, 1954, the employer required as a condition to his return that he sign a waiver relative to his legs, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Upon the advice of the defendant union, to which he belonged, S refused to sign such a waiver, and as a result of such refusal the plaintiff refused to allow him to resume work on June 28,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters of America v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- In re Curtis & Castle ArbitrationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Liggett v. Torrington Building Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Pratt, Read & Co. v. United Furniture Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- American Brass Co. v. Torrington Brass Workers' Union Local 423Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kilby v. St. Paul InsuranceConnecticut Superior Court · 1970