Legal Opinion

Royal McBee Corp. v. Royal Industrial Union Local 937

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 10, 1955No. File 101296PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.

The present applications arise out of the following circumstances: S was an employee of the plaintiff corporation and for a considerable period of time was justifiably absent from work because of a leg condition. When his health permitted his return to work on June 28, 1954, the employer required as a condition to his return that he sign a waiver relative to his legs, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Upon the advice of the defendant union, to which he belonged, S refused to sign such a waiver, and as a result of such refusal the plaintiff refused to allow him to resume work on June 28,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters of America v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. In re Curtis & Castle ArbitrationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  3. Liggett v. Torrington Building Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Pratt, Read & Co. v. United Furniture Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  5. American Brass Co. v. Torrington Brass Workers' Union Local 423Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kilby v. St. Paul InsuranceConnecticut Superior Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API