Legal Opinion
Liggett v. Torrington Building Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 5, 1932PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
Pursuant to a written contract, the Torrington Building Company (appellee) erected a stone dwelling-house for Richard H. and Lura M. A. Liggett, husband and wife, in Litchfield, and claimed from them the balance of the contract price certified by the architect as owing; while the owners claimed damages from the contractor for work improperly done under the contract. The parties, not being able to settle the controversy, agreed upon arbitration, pursuant to General Statutes, 1918, § 5993. A rule of court was entered October 18th, 1929, upon agreement of the parties, ordering them to submit to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Curtis & Castle ArbitrationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- White Star Mining Co. v. HultbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Hall v. Norwalk Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
- Brown v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
- Allen v. RanneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1816
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Bic Pen Corporation v. Local No. 134Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- American Almond Products Co. v. Consolidated Pecan Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Bodner v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.