Legal Opinion
Anselmo v. Cox
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 21, 1948PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The plaintiff brought this action against the state highway commissioner and others to recover damages for the total temporary taking of the right of access to his property. The highway commissioner, representing the state of Connecticut, interposed a demurrer to the substituted complaint. The parties and the trial court, in disposing of the issues raised by the demurrer, ignored technical defects and irregularities and dealt with the action as one solely against the state. We follow the same course. Cole v. Jerman, 77 Conn. 374, 382, 59 A. 425; Conn. App. Proc. §§ 23, 22, 21. Judgment was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- County of Chester v. BrowerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Bradley v. New-York & New-Haven Rail-RoadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1851
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Jenkins v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Fetterman v. University of ConnecticutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Textron, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Sentner v. Board of Trustees of Regional Community CollegesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.