Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Mecosta County General Hospital

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 2002No. Docket 212675PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, P.J.

In our original opinion, this Court held that defendants had waived their challenge to the adequacy of plaintiff’s notices of intent to bring this medical malpractice case by waiting until after the complaint was filed. Roberts v Mecosta Co General Hosp, 240 Mich App 175, 185-186; 610 NW2d 285 (2000). Thereafter, the Supreme Court reversed, holding that the statute imposes no obligation on defendants to object to the notice of intent before the complaint is filed. Roberts v Mecosta Co General Hosp, 466 Mich 57, 66; 642 NW2d 663 (2002). The matter is now on remand to this Court for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wickens v. Oakwood Healthcare SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Omne Financial, Inc v. Shacks, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Tyler v. Livonia Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burton v. Reed City Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. City of Warren v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Gulley-Reaves v. BaciewiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Boodt v. Borgess Medical CenterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API