Legal Opinion

People v. Stone

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2001No. Docket 114227PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

This criminal prosecution under the Michigan eavesdropping statutes requires us to decide whether a conversation held on a cordless telephone is a “private conversation” as that term is used in the statutes. We conclude that, although current technology may allow cordless telephone conversations to be intercepted, such conversations nonetheless can be private conversations under the eavesdropping statutes. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

i

The facts underlying this case occurred while the divorce of defendant Brian Stone from Joanne Stone was pending. During their…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. MoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. DossMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People v. DenioMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wickens v. Oakwood Healthcare SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Lewis v. LeGrowMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Stanton v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. McLaughlinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API